Powered By Blogger

Publius Speaks

Publius Speaks
Become A Follower

11/02/2020

Let "ONE TERM" for Tenney REMAIN as "One Too Many!"

 (an essay written to potential voters of NY’s 22nd congressional district on Election Day Eve, Nov. 2nd, 2020, to remind them why a local congressional election is important to their future.  Hopefully, it rings true for voters in other districts who also face a “Trumper” running for office.)  

Sorry to have to say it, but it must be said:  Claudia Tenney will be useless in Congress.  Why?  Because the House of Representatives will surely be Democratic once again and Tenney has a record that shows her bipartisanship to be on the lower end of the scale from her last sojourn in Washington (see Govtrack.com).  If she couldn’t get any bills signed into law during her term when Trump was President and Republicans held the majority in both Houses, what can we expect to happen if this time around Democrats hold onto the House, regain the Senate or at least reduce the GOP majority to a razor-thin margin, and the presidency is held by Joe Biden?  Claudia Tenney will be as irrelevant as a legislator as Bill Barr will be as ‘ex-Attorney General’.   

It makes no sense whatsoever to send Claudia Tenney into a Democratic Congress where she will have little opportunity to work with a majority she despises and a newly elected President she has maligned.  What that means very simply is that this district in Central New York is going to miss a golden opportunity to bring home some much-needed attention to this area.  Tenney will perhaps still be able to serve individual constituents who need help with red tape or difficulty with the IRS but her working on legislation that names streets or buildings or post offices after local people who deserve such recognition, is about all that can be expected.  She is not going to get legislation signed into law that promotes a local company like the SPOONS Act did for Sherill Manufacturing under Congressman Anthony Brindisi’s leadership.

Despite what one Utica O-D Opinion letter-writer tried to claim -- that Brindisi couldn’t rightfully claim that he was responsible for that Act since Claudia Tenney was the one who authored it when she was in office -- the argument that Tenney should get the credit for that Act fails on two accounts.  One, Tenney did not get enough bi-partisan support for her bill, and two, Tenney failed to get it passed in the Senate and signed into law by her idol, Donald Trump.  She failed to get it into law, unlike Congressman Brindisi who GOT IT DONE, enlisting bi-partisan support all along the way, and then getting it signed by a president who even today in a Tenney TV ad denigrates Rep. Brindisi for being a “Liberal” who votes with Nancy Pelosi and not with him.  Yet, this man who occupies the White House (hopefully, not much longer) has signed six bills authored and managed by this so-called “Liberal” Pelosi-supporter that will assist constituencies that Republicans used to support --  veterans, farmers, small businesses including his two latest bills focused on veterans' Mental Health.  Tenney got no such bills signed into law – nada; zilch, zero, none!  And that, my friends is the whole point – it matters what gets signed into law, not what gets proposed and never reaches that final level!  Tenney failed; Anthony Brindisi GOT IT DONE!

And, Brindisi has been recognized nationally for his sterling efforts by the national Chamber of Commerce organization.  

  One more thing.  This claim that Congressman Brindisi is tied into the Democratic majority in the House and therefore a flaming Liberal -- is not only irrelevant, it misses two important points:

One our Congressman is widely recognized as a moderate Democrat who has supported progressive and pragmatic legislation, not certain legislators, or leaders.  Because he believes in fair elections, and adequate and affordable healthcare, in measures that aid people dealing with the burdens of poverty, or measures that aid in environmental clean-up,  does not make him a “puppet of Pelosi” or anyone else.  He votes for resolution of issues and problems that are national but affect his local constituents as well.

Two – because he is in Washington to solve problems, he cooperates with many people who want to address such problems.  Some are liberal, some moderate, some conservative.  An in-depth analysis of Brindisi’s activity by GovTrack.com indicates a person whose ideology is much more toward moderate right than radical left.  They rank only eight Democrats in the House to the Right of his ideology which indicates a far different picture than the false one that Trump/Tenney have thrown at him and us.  Brindisi has never been, and probably will never be, a Radical Left politician.  His work on the Utica School Board, in the New York State Assembly and now as a problem-solver in the U.S. Congress has never been ‘radical’ but moderately progressive. As a moderate, he has emerged as one of the leaders of a bi-partisan group in the House that defines itself as “Problem-solvers.” 

Association with certain individuals or groups is NOT the issue.  The issue is: what can be accomplished to address the needs of people of this nation, and the people back home in central New York.  Anthony Brindisi, I believe, acts upon a core belief that he was sent to Congress to solve problems and reform systems and structures that prevent the solving of those problems and issues.  Those who reduce the duty of congresspersons to ideological and political absurdities with “buzz words,” or to accusations because of necessary association with other representatives and with leaders, make themselves into obstructionists.  With their glaring misrepresentations, they are the ones who keep problems from being resolved and better avenues of implementation from being created.  They are the ones who build walls, not bridges.  They are the ones who do not work in the best interests of the People because their main concern is not problem-solving but making problems for adversaries that end up making problems for us all because nothing gets done!

When Nancy Pelosi is making it possible to pass problem-solving legislation, or legislation that faces future challenges, or legislation that expands people’s rights and freedoms; rebuilds our infrastructure, or any other worthwhile endeavor that improves our lives, then we must thank Congressman Brindisi for associating himself with those efforts on behalf of the people, whether those actions are considered liberal or conservative. 

We are left with the question: what matters most in terms of voting?  Whether your ideology leans left or right from the center of the political spectrum, what is important in the short and long run is the desire,  the skill and the pragmatism to solve problems in order to protect our health, our lives, our freedoms and our values as demonstrated by Brindisi’s extraordinary accomplishments as a first-term Congressperson.

In stark contrast, stands Donald J. Trump -- a narcissist, inveterate liar, bully, child abuser, and failed businessman who displays and values fascist tendencies -- has no business leading this country.  And, what’s worse perhaps, we do not need unquestioning sycophantic cult-like followers like Claudia Tenney who, whether her despotic leader is still calling the shots or is shunted out into the night, has no business being in the Congress dedicated to adversarial and ideological outcomes rather than critical problem-solving applied to the needs, problems and issues of our people.  Claudia Tenney is not equipped to get the job done, because what appears to be of most importance to her is securing her own future and prosperity by catering to wealthy individuals and rich corporations, not resolving problems or meeting needs facing the rest of us. Why would she vote consistently against affordable and universal healthcare for constituents unless something or someone was motivating her to do so for her own good?  If she is elected, those who voted her back in office will be the losers because she will:

Ø  continue deconstruction of government

Ø  diminish government assurances to us of Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid;

Ø  continue attacks on consumer protection and advocacy through deregulation of the for-profit market,

Ø  denude its ability to guard us against war, domestic terrorism, and loss of rights like universal unrestricted voting. 

Help “One-Term Tenney” keep her title – it fits perfectly!

RE-ELECT CONGRESSMAN ANTHONY BRINDISI – HE “GETS THINGS DONE”!