1) Separating immigrant children
from their parents, without legal justification, and subjecting them to
detention (a form of imprisonment) is a clear denial of fundamental and
universal human rights.
The United Nations
Declaration on Human Rights, signed and accepted almost 70 years ago by the
United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1948 (including the United
States of America), contains a common standard of achievements for all peoples
and all nations, setting out fundamental human rights to be universally
protected. It declares the following:
In the Preamble:
“recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and
inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of
freedom, justice and peace in the world“disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind…
“it is essential… that human rights should be protected by the rule of law.”
Some Pertinent Articles:
I Article 1. All
human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed
with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of
brotherhood.
Article 2. Everyone is entitled to all the rights and
freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such
as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national
or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction
shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international
status of the country or territory to which a person belongs,
Article 3. Everyone has the right to life, liberty
and security of person.
Article 5. No one shall be subjected to torture or to
cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 6. Everyone has the right to recognition
everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7. All are equal before the law and are
entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law.
Article 8. Everyone
has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for
acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by
law.
Article 9. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary
arrest, detention or exile.
Article 10. Everyone
is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and
impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of
any criminal charge against him.
Article 11. (1)
Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent
until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all
the guarantees necessary for his defense.
Article 12. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Article 14. (1)
Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from
persecution.Article 12. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Article 15. (1)
Everyone has the right to a nationality.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.
Article 16. (3)
The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled
to protection by society and the State.(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.
Article 25. (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
Article 28. Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
The USA signed on to the Declaration on Human Rights in 1948, and to the Children’s Convention on Child Rights (CRC) in 1989. To “undertake the obligations of the CRC (by ratifying or acceding to it), national governments have committed themselves to protecting and ensuring children's rights – and they have agreed to hold themselves accountable for this commitment before the international community. State parties to the Convention are obliged to develop and undertake all actions and policies in the light of the best interests of the child”. Moreover, “the Convention sets out these rights in 54 articles and two Optional Protocols. It spells out the basic human rights that children everywhere have:
- the right to survival;
- to develop to the fullest;
- to protection from harmful influences, abuse and exploitation;
and to participate fully in family, cultural and social life (emphasis mine).
- The four core principles
of the Convention are non-discrimination; devotion to the best interests
of the child; the right to life, survival and development; and respect for
the views of the child.”
3) While the separation of children
from their parents, and the detention in inadequate facilities, is clearly a
violation of universal human rights and our own principles (like Japanese
internment camps were during WWII) it is also clearly a violation of our rule
of law. We have
enshrined within out Constitution, and our laws of justice, the fundamental
principles of:
-
Due process - legal
requirement that the state must respect all legal rights that are owed to
a person
- The right to be charged or
to be freed from questioning by police authorities; plus the right to be
silent
- Innocent until proven
guilty
- Right to habeas corpus (a
recourse in law challenging the reasons or conditions of a person's
confinement) so that containment can be limited and justice un-delayed. It
is an independent civil action and a form of collateral attack to
determine not the guilt or innocence of the person held in custody, but
whether the custody is unlawful under the U.S. Constitution.” (Merriam-Webster)
- The right to a speedy
trial by a jury of one’s peers, or perhaps at least a hearing by a panel
of jurists or a court-ordered arbitrator.
- The right to equal
protection under law
The unfortunate answer must be a resounding YES, and every brain-washed
Trump supporter should take note: this policy is not making America great; it
will destroy us and our unique democracy because it ultimately will transform
us into a nation based on individualized protections, discriminatory policies
and laws that grant power, privilege and protection only to those deemed worthy
– all ruled over by a despot and despotic cabal.
4) Finally, it is time to stop equivocating about what these
actions and behaviors constitute. THIS
IS CHILD ABUSE, pure and simple.
And, child abuse or neglect is punishable by legal means, at least in a normal
civil society. It is time for Donald J.
Trump, and many members of Congress to receive the consequences for their
actions, and mainly their non-action or neglect. Because they are ultimately
“caretakers” or “protectors” of children, they bear a special responsibility to
avoid doing harm to children, and even to avoid the possible threat of harm
coming upon children. Moreover, they cannot avoid the charge of abusing
children based on their neglect of the well-being, protections, rights, nourishment
and overall development that children should have been provided by our elected
caretakers who are uniquely responsible for their welfare.
Yes, I have written about this before in another context,
and I refer you to that posting on 10/10/2017. Let me just quote a few thoughts about which I spoke in that
piece:
“if the
definition of caregiver or caretaker is expanded to reflect the care given by
others in the social network... then anyone paid
to be responsible for domestic tranquility, the general welfare, and to secure
the blessings of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, might well be
considered a caretaker in a very broad sense, but also in a very real sense.”
““The Republican Radicals in Congress have decided …(to) cut funding for
almost every program that benefits, encourages, nurtures and promotes children
and their development: research,
universal pre-K education, housing for the homeless and the poor, adequate
funding for all schools and the resources necessary to bring about a
world-class education for all; they cut Head Start, Aid to children and
families, food stamps, and housing subsidies, and ultimate repeal of the entire
Affordable Care Act, having already gutted important parts of it. They have neglected children with special
needs; have cut Pell grants and neglected to cut back on interest rates for
student loans. They neglect entirely the
special needs of homeless children, children with disabilities, children who
will not go to college, and of those who drop out of school. They have done nothing to reform the juvenile
justice system or the over-incarceration of drug-abusers. They have neglected the potential of minority
children and have instead laid the groundwork for them to be labeled as
perpetual felons with no vote, no rights and no jobs. I call this abuse and neglect of children who
are our most valuable resource. The
congressional naysayers are child abusers and for that they must be called to
account. Impeachment for them is too
mild.”
“And let’s not forget, voters who continuously return abusive
politicians to office are themselves abettors of abuse, neglecting their duty
to protect their own children and grandchildren. I speak directly to those many seniors who
supported Donald Trump, and who, by so doing, have unleashed a child abuser
upon their own grandchildren and on my grandchildren. Shame on you!
You, and others, can perhaps redeem yourselves by never ever voting again for
politicians who willfully or neglectfully support cutting back on programs that
benefit our children and grandchildren. It’s time to stand up and challenge the
child abusers in the White House and in the Congress.”
However, a majority of Republicans support the Trump
administration's policy of separating migrant children from their parents when
they are caught illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, an April 2018 Quinnipiac University poll found. Republican voters support the policy 55 to 35 percent,
according to the poll. They are the only
listed party, gender, education, age or racial group to support the policy,
according to Quinnipiac. Sixty-six percent of American voters oppose the policy,
according to the poll.
We all need to push back against the Trumpian tactic of
calling questionable behavior, hate speech, or factual detail by something
other than what it is. Lying,
distraction, word manipulation, realignment of acceptable and reasonable
definitions of words and behaviors, as well as the twisting of moral and
ethical principles, serves to blind us to what is really happening to our basic
and fundamental beliefs and values. Trump has disemboweled truth. He has made us the victims of blurred reality
and is embarked upon a path of creating a society and a form of government that
cannot maintain a set of values or principles because those values and
principles are seen as ‘fake’ or no one’s responsibility, or politically expedient. Bad, even evil or illegal behavior that does harm,
or has the potential to harm others, is made allowable because everybody does
it, or because it can be attributed to someone else or because it is a
necessary means to an end or outcome that is defined as a necessity by an
elected official, a designated office-holder, a Fuhrer, or a would-be dictator.
The plain truth is that these actions laid on the backs of
small children are acts of violence, aggression, unmitigated abuse with
virulent aspects of illegality attached to them. Trump, child abuser and
prejudiced nationalist, is using the most precious resource available to make
it rough on asylum-seekers and immigrants from cultures and countries that he
despises. Separation of families seeking
asylum is an act of aggression against those children and families which serves
to undermine the universal values of which the UN Declaration on Human Rights
speaks. This so-called 'policy' must not stand. Determine now to do all you can to rid our
White House, our Congress (and tangentially, our Judiciary) from these
de-constructionists of democratic values and institutions, these violent
fascists, these child abusers; these destroyers of democracy and universal
human rights. The child abusers and
abettors, who support this policy, must be voted out-of-power everywhere in November 2018!
UPDATE: What a difference a day makes! Donald Trump recognizes when bad publicity and bad policy are slamming him, personally and politically, and (according to news reports) his wife and daughter got on his case in deep background. But, here's the question: does his signing of an Executive Order that essentially calls for maintaining unity for immigrant children and their parents while they are detained really solve anything?
UPDATE: What a difference a day makes! Donald Trump recognizes when bad publicity and bad policy are slamming him, personally and politically, and (according to news reports) his wife and daughter got on his case in deep background. But, here's the question: does his signing of an Executive Order that essentially calls for maintaining unity for immigrant children and their parents while they are detained really solve anything?
Are we being BAMBOOZLED? Of course we are. First, an Executive Order is not necessarily a problem-solver; it can be more like a symbol, a publicity stunt, a politically-motivated promoter of good feelings, compassion and "heart." They are sometimes so devoid of detail that issues and problems are exacerbated instead of being resolved.
That is the case here. First, the E.O. will provoke Court cases, not only on behalf of the children and their families, but because there is a court order based on a Consent Decree between the Court and the Executive, that impinges upon this E.O. by asserting that detention of migrant children can be no longer than 20 days, and the E.O. does not address that issue. That will have to be resolved in court and it will take time to do so.
Then, there are a few more matters it doesn't address, like: where are the (estimated) 2,500 children who have already been separated from parents? How will they be re-united with parents who may have been deported to their home countries? No one has an answer -- there is no defined process in the Order.
On top of that, even before he signed this order, Trump and his minions began a policy of transporting unattended children to other parts of the country (even to NY!). And how will private and public agencies who care for children get ready for that onslaught if they have no guidance, no direction, no training and no monetary support for the inevitable increase of services for these traumatized kids?
He also wants to start placing families and children in tents or temporary fabricated shelters on military bases! WOW! a brilliant Plan. I wonder just how excited those commanders and their troops are about doing social work instead of being on a military mission? It says to me that Trump is still just trying to discourage illegal immigration; he still sees his mission as that of providing discouragement to other potential border-crossers about seeking asylum or immigrating to this country, if they have nothing to offer us, or are not the right "kind."
This mess isn't over by a long shot! That Executive Order is the Trumpian response to something that got out-of-hand and smacked him right in the face. His "compassionate, heartfelt" response was, of course, to fly off to Minnesota where he will address a rally and attempt to blame Obama and the Democrats for a policy that was discussed by leaders of the Trump administration early-on in his term. They knew what they wanted to do -- promote zero-tolerance no matter what. As usual, the Donald and his cow-towing under-lords just didn't see the public reaction being as troubled and as deeply felt as it was.
So, don't stop reacting just because a 'fake' E.O. was signed. Watch the process; watch for more abuse; watch for long delays in re-uniting families; watch for detention that is nothing more than imprisonment. Watch for what a tyrant uses to get his way and to derive more power over his government and his people. Watch for those Republican representatives and what they will settle for and trade off in order to lick the boots of their authoritarian leader. And finally, you might want to peruse my postings on the points that characterize authoritarian leaders -- take a look at: 11/16 and 11/21/2015; 8/6 and 8/14/2017.
Trump is getting closer and closer to being a full-blown tyrant, and this debacle about zero tolerance on illegal immigration is a real clear demonstration of the path he is on.
That is the case here. First, the E.O. will provoke Court cases, not only on behalf of the children and their families, but because there is a court order based on a Consent Decree between the Court and the Executive, that impinges upon this E.O. by asserting that detention of migrant children can be no longer than 20 days, and the E.O. does not address that issue. That will have to be resolved in court and it will take time to do so.
Then, there are a few more matters it doesn't address, like: where are the (estimated) 2,500 children who have already been separated from parents? How will they be re-united with parents who may have been deported to their home countries? No one has an answer -- there is no defined process in the Order.
On top of that, even before he signed this order, Trump and his minions began a policy of transporting unattended children to other parts of the country (even to NY!). And how will private and public agencies who care for children get ready for that onslaught if they have no guidance, no direction, no training and no monetary support for the inevitable increase of services for these traumatized kids?
He also wants to start placing families and children in tents or temporary fabricated shelters on military bases! WOW! a brilliant Plan. I wonder just how excited those commanders and their troops are about doing social work instead of being on a military mission? It says to me that Trump is still just trying to discourage illegal immigration; he still sees his mission as that of providing discouragement to other potential border-crossers about seeking asylum or immigrating to this country, if they have nothing to offer us, or are not the right "kind."
This mess isn't over by a long shot! That Executive Order is the Trumpian response to something that got out-of-hand and smacked him right in the face. His "compassionate, heartfelt" response was, of course, to fly off to Minnesota where he will address a rally and attempt to blame Obama and the Democrats for a policy that was discussed by leaders of the Trump administration early-on in his term. They knew what they wanted to do -- promote zero-tolerance no matter what. As usual, the Donald and his cow-towing under-lords just didn't see the public reaction being as troubled and as deeply felt as it was.
So, don't stop reacting just because a 'fake' E.O. was signed. Watch the process; watch for more abuse; watch for long delays in re-uniting families; watch for detention that is nothing more than imprisonment. Watch for what a tyrant uses to get his way and to derive more power over his government and his people. Watch for those Republican representatives and what they will settle for and trade off in order to lick the boots of their authoritarian leader. And finally, you might want to peruse my postings on the points that characterize authoritarian leaders -- take a look at: 11/16 and 11/21/2015; 8/6 and 8/14/2017.
Trump is getting closer and closer to being a full-blown tyrant, and this debacle about zero tolerance on illegal immigration is a real clear demonstration of the path he is on.